References

Full report available on the IRISS website.

• Alzheimer's Scotland (2010), Let's get personal! Personalisation and dementia, Edinburgh: Alzheimer's Scotland
• Barton P, Stirling B, Glasby J et al (2006), National Evaluation of the Costs and Outcomes of Intermediate Care, Leicester: University of Leicester/ University of Birmingham
• Beech R, Russell W, Little R et al (2004), An evaluation of a multi-disciplinary team for intermediate care at home, International Journal of Integrated Care, 4
• Bowes A and Bell D (2007), Free personal care for older people in Scotland: Issues and implications, Social Policy and Society, 6, 435-445
• Challis D, Darton R, Hughes J et al (2001), Intensive care management at home: an alternative to institutional care?, Age and Ageing, 30, 409-413
• Chester H, Hughes J and Challis D (2009), Recruitment and Retention of a Social Care Workforce for Older People, Discussion Paper M215, University of Manchester: PSSRU
• Clarkson P, Abendstern M, Sutcliffe C et al (2009), Reliability of needs assessment in the community care of older people: impact of the single assessment process in England, Journal of Public Health, 31, 521-529
• Cutchin MP, Coppola S, Talley, V et al (2009), Feasibility and effects of preventive home visits for at-risk older people: design of a randomised controlled trial, BMC Geriatrics, 9, 54
• De Montfort University (2000), Leicestershire County Council - External Evaluation of the Home Care Reablement Pilot
• Dickinson H, Glasby J, Forder J et al (2007), Free personal care in Scotland: A narrative review, British Journal of Social Work, 37, 459-474
• Durand M, James A, Ravishankar A et al (2009), Domiciliary and day care services: why do people with dementia refuse?, Aging and Mental Health, 13, 414-419
• Eccles A (2008), Single Shared Assessment: the limits to 'quick fix' implementation, Journal of Integrated Care, 16 (1), 22-30
• Eccles A (2010), Ethical considerations around the implementation of telecare technologies, Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28, 44-59
• Eckert JK, Morgan LA and Swamy N (2004), Preferences for receipt of care among community dwelling adults, Journal of Ageing and Social Policy, 16, 49-65
• Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M et al (2001), Effectiveness of home-based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis, British Medical Journal, 323, 719
• Eloranta S, Routasalo P and Arve S (2008), Personal resources supporting living at home as described by older care clients, International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14, 308-314
• Gilbert R, Todd C, May M et al (2010), Socio- democratic factors predict the likelihood of not returning home after hospital admission following a fall, Journal of Public Health, 32, 117-124
• Gillespie L and Handoll HHG (2009), Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in older people, Injury Prevention, 15, 354-355
• Glasby J and Dickinson H (2008), Partnership Working in Health and Social Care, Bristol: Policy Press
• Glasby J, Littlechild R and Pryce K (2004), Show me the way to go home: A narrative review of the literature on delayed discharges and older people, British Journal of Social Work, 34, 1189-1197
• Glendinning C, Arksey H, Jones K et al (2007), The Individual Budget Pilots: impact and outcomes for carers, York: Social Policy Research Unit
• Glendinning C, Clarke S, Hare P et al (2008), Progress and problems in developing outcomes- focused social care services for older people in England, Health and Social Care in the Community, 16, 54-63
• Hubbard G, Donaghy E, Godfrey M et al (2008), Reimbursement in Practice: the last piece of the jigsaw: A comparative study of delayed hospital discharge in England and Scotland
• Hyde C J, Robert I E and Sinclair A J (2000), The effects of supporting discharge from hospital to home in older people, Age and Ageing, 29, 271-279
• Karlsson M, Mayhew L, Plumb R et al (2006), Future costs for long-term care: Cost projections for long-term care for older people in the United Kingdom, Health Policy, 75, 187-213
• McCreadie C and Tinker A. (2005), The acceptability of assistive technology to older people, Ageing and Society, 25, 91-110
• McLeod B and Mair M (2009), Evaluation of City of Edinburgh Council Home Care Re-Ablement service, Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research
• McLeod E, Bywaters P, Tanner D et al (2008), For the sake of their health: older service users requirements for social care to facilitate access to social networks following hospital discharge, British Journal of Social Work, 38, 73-90
• Manthorpe J, Clough R, Cornes M et al (2007), Four years on: The impact of the National Service Framework for older people on the experiences, expectations and views of older people, Age and Ageing, 36, 501-507
• Miller E (2007), Identifying the Outcomes Important to Unpaid Carers, Edinburgh: Scottish Government Joint Improvement Team https://www.jitscotland.org.uk/action-areas/themes/involvement.html
• Miller E and Cameron K (2011), Challenges and benefits in implementing shared assessment across the UK: A literature review, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 39 - 45
• Mottram P, Pitkala K and Lees C (2007), Institutional versus at home long term care for functionally dependent older people, Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 4
• National Audit Office (2003), Ensuring the Effective Discharge of Older Patients from NHS Acute Hospitals, London: The Stationery Office
• Parker G, Bhakta P, Katbamna S et al (2000), Best place of care for older people after acute and during sub-acute illness: a systematic review, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5, 176-189
• PSSRU (2007), Paying for Long-Term Care for Older People in the UK: Modeling the Costs and Distributional Effects of a Range of Options, Kent: PSSRU
• PSSRU (2009), The National Evaluation of Partnerships for Older People
• Regen E, Glasby J, Hewitt G et al (2008), Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites, Health and Social Care in the Community, 16, 629-637
• Reilly S, Hughes J and Challis D (2010), Case management for long term conditions: implementation and processes, Ageing and Society, 30, 125-155
• Rose A, O'Shea D and Walker H F (2002), Impact of a dedicated syncope and falls facility for older adults on emergency beds, Age and Ageing, 31, 272-275
• Ryburn B, Wells Y and Foreman P (2009), Enabling independence: restorative approaches to home care provision for frail older adults, Health and Social Care in the Community, 17, 225-234
• Sargent P, Pickard S, Sheaff R et al (2007), Patient and carer perceptions of case management for long term conditions, Health and Social Care in the Community,15, 511-519
• Schoenmakers B, Buntinx F and DeLepeleire J (2010), Supporting the dementia family caregiver: The effect of home care intervention on general wellbeing, Aging and Mental Health, 14, 44-56
• Seddon D, Robinson C, Reeves C et al (2007), In their own right: translating the policy of carer assessment into practice, British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1335-1352
• Shepperd S, McClaran J, Phillips C et al (2010), Discharge planning from hospital to home, Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 1
• Slasberg C (2009), Re-ablement, efficiency and outcomes working, Journal of Care Services Management, 4 (2), 141-149
• Stalker K and Campbell I (2002), Review of Care Management in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit
• Trappe Lomax T, Ellis A, Fox M et al (2006), Buying time I: a prospective, controlled trial of a joint health/social care residential unit for older people on discharge from hospital, Health and Social Care in the Community, 14, 49-62
• Walker L and Jamrozik K (2005), Effectiveness of screening for risk of medical emergencies in the elderly, Age and Ageing, 34, 238-242
• Wilson K, Mottram P and Hussain M (2006), Survival in the community of the very old depressed discharged from medical inpatient care, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 974-979
• Young J and Stevenson J (2006), Intermediate care in England: where next?, Age and Ageing, 35, 339-341